Submit Comments

---

Submitting comments to the Maryland Public Service Commission (PSC) is a vital way to share your thoughts, concerns, or support for a project like the Maryland Piedmont Reliability Project (MPRP). Your comments become part of the public record, providing valuable input that the PSC considers during the decision-making process. Whether you choose to submit your comments electronically or by mail, this guide will walk you through the steps to ensure your voice is heard.

Public comments provide a platform for a diverse range of voices and interests to be heard during the Maryland Public Service Commission’s (PSC) review process. Landowners and adjacent landowners can share personal stories about how the Maryland Piedmont Reliability Project (MPRP) may impact their properties, livelihoods, and communities. Individuals concerned about environmental protection can raise awareness of potential risks to local ecosystems, wildlife, and natural resources. Those worried about higher energy costs can highlight the financial burdens that may arise from the project and advocate for cost-effective solutions. Additionally, advocates and experts with specialized knowledge can offer valuable insights on the project, including viable alternatives, such as distributed energy systems, underground transmission lines, or optimizing existing infrastructure. Each perspective enriches the decision-making process by ensuring the PSC considers all aspects of the project’s impact.

Written comments from those opposed to the Maryland Piedmont Reliability Project (MPRP) are crucial to ensuring that the concerns of affected communities are fully considered. While supporters of the project, such as the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers (IBEW), are likely to submit comments highlighting potential job creation or economic benefits, opposition voices provide a critical balance by drawing attention to likely environmental, economic, and social harms that might otherwise be overlooked. These comments help the Maryland Public Service Commission (PSC) understand the broader consequences of the project, such as property devaluation, ecosystem disruption, and increased energy costs. By presenting compelling, well-supported arguments, opponents can counteract one-sided narratives and advocate for alternatives that better protect the interests of local residents and the environment. Your written comment ensures that opposition is clearly documented and considered in the decision-making process.

Stop MPRP, Inc. recommends everyone who opposes the project, for any reason, submit both written and verbal comments.